What is the difference between proactive and reactive policing




















That means that you have been released from custody without charge with no obligation to return on bail for the offence; however the investigation will remain ongoing and you will be notified of the outcome of the investigation in due course. Q: Can I travel abroad if I have been released under investigation? A: The short answer is yes. If you wish to travel out of the country there is no restriction on this. However, should the Police wish to speak to you again you may not be available and this may delay matters for you.

After a crime has been reported A police investigation will involve the police speaking to you about the incident.

If the crime is serious or sensitive, then a detective may be appointed to investigate. In some cases the police may decide they do not need to speak to you again during their investigation.

Assuming they have permission from the courts, the police can legally detain a suspect without charge for a maximum of four days. Proactive policing requires the police to work with community groups to become informed of issues that should be remedied before a crime occurs.

Proactive policing deals with community issues and addresses the concerns of people involved in a setting every day to become aware of smaller incidents or disorder that could lead to criminal activity. Both types of policing methods are used in law enforcement, with continuous efforts given to hone the newer proactive policing method. World View. More From Reference. Reactive policing can be defined as the police responding to specific requests from individuals or groups in the community which encompasses "immediate response to calls" and "follow-up investigations".

However, the rationale for routine patrol is not as straightforward. Traditional thinking suggests that the mere presence of a police vehicle will act as a deterrent to crime Trojanowicz et al. According to Crank , routine or random preventative patrol is by definition reactive policing. There is no initiative on the part of the officer or the organization to target a specific area or problem within the geographical patrol district.

However, it can also be argued that routine patrol is required in order to facilitate response in a timely manner to dispatch calls.

In contrast, proactive policing involves the "police, acting on their own initiative, [to] develop information about crime and strategies for its suppression" Crank, This can also be interpreted in a myriad of ways.

For example, an officer responding reactively to a dispatched call could, nonetheless, resolve the issue proactively by mediating between the parties or using informal action. Similarly, in contrast to routine patrol, directed patrol involves police officers being instructed to monitor specific areas that are identified through problem or crime analysis when they are not responding to dispatch calls McKenna, Directed patrol is more proactive than random preventative patrol; however, it still lacks the component of problem oriented policing which engages the community in resolving crime issues.

One American study found that proactive policing resulted in more arrests, detention and filing of reports than reactive policing Seagrave, Possible reasons suggested were the need for more forceful action to gain "legitimacy and control" as well as officers having made a decision beforehand which prompted a proactive mobilization Seagrave, This finding appears to be counterintuitive to what one would expect when officers employ problem-oriented policing.

Thus, these findings suggest a need to distinguish clearly between proactive mobilization and problem-oriented policing practices Section 7. We attempted to ascertain where on the continuum of "reactive" and "proactive" police officers perceive their work in relation to youth crime.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000